WWW.PROTu-154.NET
Project Tupolev Team Forum Index Log in Register FAQ Memberlist Search

Project Tupolev Team Forum Index » Project Tupolev Flight School » WalterLeo exerc 1 Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Post new topic  Reply to topic View previous topic :: View next topic 
WalterLeo exerc 1
PostPosted: Thu Feb 18, 2010 18:21 Reply with quote
WalterLeo
КВС
Joined: 10 Feb 2009
Posts: 601
Location: Viena Austria




Tried to fly exercise 1 at Cancun international (MMUN) rwy 12, nowind.

To 76,6 to Cax=29,9 % LW ca 1 to less
Tu 154M

Have to train to use the altimeters in m!

Best regards

Walter
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

PostPosted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 12:47 Reply with quote
Bell
КВС
Joined: 29 Mar 2005
Posts: 1206
Location: UNNT




Hi Walter, glad to see you here...

First, I'll answer your questions from the topic above..

WalterLeo wrote:


Trying to fly exercise 1 I found some things out:
The VOR at UHHH doesnt work.

The circuit itselfs is much wider than a circuit in a B 727. 4km againt 8 km
Is that a question of how the Tu is built or is it a way of how flying in Russia is being trained.

Different is also the early flap and slat retraction at 200 m QFE and the bank-limit of 15 deg while flaps are out (727: 30 deg max turn to final with landing-flaps deployed).


1. Circuit width 8 km is set for the exercises only. I think this number appeared because it is a general width for the circuits on Russian charts.
2. You can choose any airport for the first ex., not only UHHH which was given as an example.
3. There is restriction for Tu: bank 15* at the speed below 340 kph or 250 m meters while climbing and at the speed below 280 kph on approach.

Second...

Don't you want to try B2 model for exercises? I ask this question because it is very complecated to fit in the ex 1 requirements on M model if you had no good experience on B2. It's because engines thrust much higher on M comparing with B2.

Anyway... I'll need some time to analyze you flight, and provide you report later tonight.

_________________
С уважением, Алексей.
View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 15:18 Reply with quote
WalterLeo
КВС
Joined: 10 Feb 2009
Posts: 601
Location: Viena Austria




Thanks Bell!

I am using M model cause I never got well the installation of the B2. Yes that trust available is enourmous at least at the low weight. Therefore it went away in altitude and speed. Грусть

The americans would call it a "hot rod".
But besides that, I presume, that the use of AP and AT in this exercise is not intended.
Нет

Fine but for a westerner as I: would be possible to use 2000 ft instead of 600 m as altitude? If you were trained with feet and knots the instrument scan in feet is more natural, the needle of the altimeter at 2000 is straight up.
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

Try with the b2
PostPosted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 18:50 Reply with quote
WalterLeo
КВС
Joined: 10 Feb 2009
Posts: 601
Location: Viena Austria




My second try this time with the B2. TO 84 to Cax 30%, LW 83 To (overweight I know!) The LM for the B2 doesnt work for me at the moment!

Best greetings

Walter
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

PostPosted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 19:18 Reply with quote
Bell
КВС
Joined: 29 Mar 2005
Posts: 1206
Location: UNNT




Walter,

If you have some problems with B2, let's learn on M. Or fix all the problems with B2 and continue learning with it. As I said above, B2 is more prefferable for initial learning, but it should work well in msfs. Finally, which model do you prefer?

Re feet altimeter, let the circuit height will be 2000 feet, no problem.

_________________
С уважением, Алексей.
View user's profile Send private message

Hi Bell!
PostPosted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 19:41 Reply with quote
WalterLeo
КВС
Joined: 10 Feb 2009
Posts: 601
Location: Viena Austria




Thanks for the prompt answer!

If you dont mind look at both flights please, on the B2 it was my first flight ever. But lets try on the M in the future, cause I feel much more comfortable with its systems already. (Dont have to look into the manual for starting up!)

Thanks

Walter



Хорошо Хорошо
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

PostPosted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 19:53 Reply with quote
Bell
КВС
Joined: 29 Mar 2005
Posts: 1206
Location: UNNT




No, I'll look the file for M in this case since these models have operating differencies and we can't mix them.

_________________
С уважением, Алексей.
View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 21:12 Reply with quote
Bell
КВС
Joined: 29 Mar 2005
Posts: 1206
Location: UNNT




Ok, let's start with M.

Try to set TOW at 80 tons and CG about 27% MAC next time for best perfomance.

Vr was 258 km/h which is higher than it shoud be. see Vr and V2 in the table below.

Gear up at 5-10 meters. You done it at 28 meters that is too high.

Take off on Tu is much complecated than landing. That's why I propose you to split learning on several stages, and we will move to another stage upon good experience with previuos stage, as we usually do with Russian students. These stages are:
- rotate + climb until 200 meters
- crosswing turn + climb to 600 meters + horizontal flight
- base turn + final turn + FAF
- descent on glide slope + landing.

Therefore, to achive good experience with stage 1, after rotate, next time, try to accelerate up to V2+40 km/h until height of 60 meters keeping pitch about 9-10*. At 60-70 meters reduce pitch accelerating up to 330-340 km/h until height of 120 meters and maintain with vertical speed about 2-3 mps at heights from 120 to 170 meters.

After you reach 330-340 km/h and 120 meters which is obligatory condition for beginning of flaps retraction, set flaps leveler from 28 to 15. Keep vertical speed at 2-3 mps. After IAS reaches about 380 km/h (it happens at 170-180 meters ot about) set flaps leveler to 0 and accelerate to 410 km/h until 0* flaps increasing pitch to prevent extra acceleration above 450 km/h.

This is the target you should achieve in the next flight. No need turn at 200 meters this time, just go straight ahead and pay attention to the first stage only, i.e. rotate speed, rotate itself, gear up, initial climb as I described.

-------

In addition...

1. Before flight you should set ABSU (САУ system) properly for manual piloting. Both buttons on PU-46 should show "yokes" but not "ОТКЛ"... Read pages 140-141 in English manual.

2. Start trimming with MET at the moment of rotate. And in horizontal flight try to keep alitude by MET only, without yoke movement. Target is to keep horizontal alitude at 2000'+/-30 feet.

3. For future reference - gears and flaps 28* extended on final before FAF, flaps 45* during descend on glide slope.

_________________
С уважением, Алексей.
View user's profile Send private message

Some questions
PostPosted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 14:15 Reply with quote
WalterLeo
КВС
Joined: 10 Feb 2009
Posts: 601
Location: Viena Austria




Bell

I presume, 2000 ft QFE, Tu-154M without winglets, is this right?
Should I freeze after stage one the simulator and switch off the Flight Data Recorder or should I fly till landing?
FAF= DME 12,2 LOC intercept?

addition:
ad 1) This time I used the flightdirector switched on the ILS, I didnt see differing indictions for pitch and bank (only the yoke). And FD worked nicely on final.
ad 2) I presume the rotation itself is done with the yoke and afterwards trim forward, if not pitch up exceeds 10 deg? (T-Tail effect?)

Happy weekend!

Walter
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

Re: Some questions
PostPosted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 19:53 Reply with quote
Bell
КВС
Joined: 29 Mar 2005
Posts: 1206
Location: UNNT




WalterLeo wrote:
I presume, 2000 ft QFE, Tu-154M without winglets, is this right?


2000'. winglets or no winglets does not matter.

WalterLeo wrote:
Should I freeze after stage one the simulator and switch off the Flight Data Recorder or should I fly till landing?


You'd better to fly till landing, of course, I'll just not be analyzing this part to avoid your workload.

WalterLeo wrote:

FAF= DME 12,2 LOC intercept?


No approach charts required for this ex. Consider glide slope interception as FAF.

WalterLeo wrote:


addition:
ad 1) This time I used the flightdirector switched on the ILS, I didnt see differing indictions for pitch and bank (only the yoke). And FD worked nicely on final.
ad 2) I presume the rotation itself is done with the yoke and afterwards trim forward, if not pitch up exceeds 10 deg? (T-Tail effect?)


1) САУ for pitch and bank should be ready before take off. You miss some procedure, probably. As I can see in the file САУ was ready when you switched on the flight directors. Take pictures of overhead and central panels before take off, please.
2) Trim up at the moment of rotation to reduce load on control column right after rotate. For msfs it should look like you return yoke to neutral position in the pitch channel.

_________________
С уважением, Алексей.
View user's profile Send private message

Autopilot
PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 14:00 Reply with quote
WalterLeo
КВС
Joined: 10 Feb 2009
Posts: 601
Location: Viena Austria




Bell

Tried this time to see, when the yokes disappear and OTKP appears: I moved the controls before T.O. all around and the low hydraulic pressure warning sounds: Then the yokes disappear OTKP appears (in white) and all AP lights are off. Recycling the CAY switch all returns to normal. Same happend while turning final, as I moved the ailerons to the stop. Sorry did not make a screenshot, will do it the next time.
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 16:54 Reply with quote
Bell
КВС
Joined: 29 Mar 2005
Posts: 1206
Location: UNNT




Some problem with hydraulics I think. I don't think you move joystik too sharply which could lead (only in msfs) to fall of the pressure in hydraulic system. Screenshot of F/E panel will be useful.

PS. I'll try to look at your file tomorrow. Need to work a little tonight, and ice hockey Russia vs. Czech Rep coming up in several hours. Улыбка

_________________
С уважением, Алексей.
View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 17:29 Reply with quote
WalterLeo
КВС
Joined: 10 Feb 2009
Posts: 601
Location: Viena Austria




Bell


Quote:
and ice hockey Russia vs. Czech Rep coming up in several hours. Улыбка


Enjoy it! and good luck.

The AP problem after more studies of the FM: I think it was my plunder: I didnt switch on the pitch and bank channels, thinking, that in this way only FD works, but seems that for stabilization mode (that AP flies the plane) you have to push "STAB" (the green switch) first. FD for the ILS should work pressing LOC and GLIDE without pushing "STAB"!
The electric pumps for the hydraulics were off and the transferswitch off and closed.
P.S. Flight of today to weight 79,8 to MAC 28 % landing 79 to 28 % Mac.
Regards

Walter
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

PostPosted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 18:39 Reply with quote
Bell
КВС
Joined: 29 Mar 2005
Posts: 1206
Location: UNNT




Have looked at the file...

1. If you perform several flights set MET to the neutral position before take off each time. Item "Триммирование" in the checklist and the highlighted lights on the picture below have to be checked before take off.
2. Nominal regime for the engines is 93,5% RPM. Try to set it more precisely.
3. Below is the picture I made for the vertical profiles you have to get (red line with tips) and you done in this flight (blue line).

Try to use short tips to get the IAS and height I set on the picture.

Do not start flaps retraction from 28* to 15* if IAS is less than 330 km/h and height is lower than 120 meters!

Vr and rotate itself were perfect in your flight.Flaps from 15 to 0 retracted very good. MET usage on this stage also good. Хорошо

PS. Something wrong with stabilizer. It has some jitter. Did you switch off the joystick in msfs and uses joystick control panel? This probably could influence hydraulic pressure loss as you described above.

_________________
С уважением, Алексей.
View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 21:28 Reply with quote
Ap0pHiS
КВС
Joined: 13 Nov 2004
Posts: 719
Location: Париж




Hello Bell,

On your diagram, you show we have to reduce pitch to increase speed from V2+40 to 330 at 60m. But I thought we should maintain V2+40 until passing 120m?

Thank you for your explanations!

_________________
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

WalterLeo exerc 1
 Project Tupolev Team Forum Index » Project Tupolev Flight School
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum
All times are GMT + 3 Hours  
Page 1 of 8  
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
  
  
 Post new topic  Reply to topic  


AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com Avitop.com
  Powered by phpBB © 2001-2005 phpBB Group. Designed for ProTu-154.com | Webmaster