WWW.PROTu-154.NET
Project Tupolev Team Forum Index Log in Register FAQ Memberlist Search

Project Tupolev Team Forum Index » Project Tupolev Flight School » WalterLeo exerc 1 Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Post new topic  Reply to topic View previous topic :: View next topic 
PostPosted: Mon May 17, 2010 09:27 Reply with quote
Bell
КВС
Joined: 29 Mar 2005
Posts: 1206
Location: UNNT




It looks like you started training on the new type of a/c.

IAS was 350 km/h at 120 meters and vertical speed increased up to 14 m/s. Not the same vertical profile as you trained before on 2.02.

0* flaps were at the height of 330 meters. The turn started at the same 330 meters, but G-force was fine.

Shortly lost the height 600 meters after the final turn.

High flare at 12 meters, but the landing was soft.

Other parts are good. Try to perform the initial climb properly since the msrp record really shows that this 2.03 model compeletely different from 2.02.

From the other side you are the first pilot among all pilots who does exercises on 2.03. Хорошо Congratulations!

_________________
С уважением, Алексей.
View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Mon May 17, 2010 21:35 Reply with quote
FireFly
КВС
Joined: 10 Nov 2004
Posts: 6495
Location: Одесса




Bell wrote:
IAS was 350 km/h at 120 meters and vertical speed increased up to 14 m/s. Not the same vertical profile as you trained before on 2.02.Хорошо Congratulations!

Yes! Хорошо

Just my two cents now - rapid acceleration below 120m occured due too low pitch (6 degrees) after takeoff rotation rather then 2.03 perfomance. Our target pitch is 9-10 degrees.

In those airport condition (15C ) 2.03 climb and acceleration perfomance comparing to 2.02 is almost same with flaps 28. Then further up with "clean" wings perfomance become slightly greater up to 1000m.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

PostPosted: Tue May 18, 2010 13:18 Reply with quote
WalterLeo
КВС
Joined: 10 Feb 2009
Posts: 601
Location: Viena Austria




FireFly
Bell


Thanks for Your comments and to Bell a good start after his vacations!

One point I am not shure is: 9 - 10 deg pitch up to 60 meters (?) fine, do you have a target value for pitch to accelerate for flap retraction "according shedule" afterwards that 120 m 340 km/h 170 m 380 km/h can be reached?
And then what pitch to use in first turn?

Thanks in advance
and sorry for believing in flying by numbers!

Walter
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

PostPosted: Tue May 18, 2010 13:29 Reply with quote
Bell
КВС
Joined: 29 Mar 2005
Posts: 1206
Location: UNNT




IAS is the main parameter you have to control while climbing.

Pitch value is given only for reference which is 9-10* until 60 meters, from 60 to 180 meters it is reducing down to 2-4* and than it will be about 15* when turning.

_________________
С уважением, Алексей.
View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Tue May 18, 2010 14:36 Reply with quote
WalterLeo
КВС
Joined: 10 Feb 2009
Posts: 601
Location: Viena Austria




Bell wrote:
IAS is the main parameter you have to control while climbing.
Pitch value is given only for reference.....


Hi Bell: This is an interesting point. Cause in my (real,"westernstyle") flighttraining there was a strong emphasis on "IAS is a function of attitude and power" and "dont chase the needles" which means dont concentrate on a single gauge which often lacks behind or has strong crossrelations with other gauges due to aerodynamic principles. In this case if you try to control airspeed looking on the IAS alone you can overdo your inputs and you get this "pilotinduced oscillations" around a target-value (too fast--up the nose- uups geting too slow down the nose...). Keeping the right attitude and the right power, IAS comes out correctly "by itself" not only in the emergency procedure for a blocked pitot-system.

All this doesnt mean, "disregard IAS", but "you can control IAS more eficiently and smoothly by attitude and power than by the IAS-indicator alone".
Therefore my insistence on the numbers for pitch.Улыбка

Best regards

Walter
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

PostPosted: Wed May 19, 2010 06:39 Reply with quote
Bell
КВС
Joined: 29 Mar 2005
Posts: 1206
Location: UNNT




I agree with you that piloting is the comprehensive process. But I read FCOM of B737 and compared it with Tu154. They show different approaches to attitude, but...

B737 FCOM

"At Vr, rotate smoothly with one continuous motion approximating, but no more than 2,5* per second..... Rotate initially toward a 15* attitude. This will result in an airspeed of approx V2+20 knonts. Initially, the FD will comand 15* nose up. However, the FD pitch command will not be used during rotation. Indicated airspeed and vertical speed are the primary instruments.... etc. "

Tu154 FCOM does not specify attitude at all, assuming, I think, the pilot get its figures upon his experience. FCOM just requires to set V2+40 km/h and climb at this IAS until 120 meters, than accelerate. It also does not specify figures for pitch or vertical speed as well as using it as primary instrument since it could be completely different for any weather conditions.

As I said above, piloting is the comprehensive process, that's why I made the example for you where indicated the Tu154M pitch figures for exercise conditions based on other students' MSRP records. But these numbers are not described in FCOM.

And I also use all essential on-board gauges to avoid ""pilotinduced oscillations" around a target-value". Улыбка

_________________
С уважением, Алексей.
View user's profile Send private message

PostPosted: Wed May 19, 2010 15:00 Reply with quote
WalterLeo
КВС
Joined: 10 Feb 2009
Posts: 601
Location: Viena Austria




Bell wrote:
Indicated airspeed and vertical speed are the primary instruments.... etc. "



Hi Bell:

Thanks for You answer, and you have an important point, which often in "western" flying" seems to be forgotten: It must be strongly asserted, that in the first moments of flight, the values AND tendencies of IAS and VSI are vital (as in the last moments also). This point had a strong significance in the Detroit and Madrid crashes of MD-82. Both crews tried to pull up to a normal attitude after T.O. (15 deg) when their aircrafts did not accelerate and climb, because the flaps and slats where not deployed and stall occured at 12 deg nose up.
These are clear examples that the cooking book of "fly by numbers" has to be taken "with a grain of salt" and cannot substitute basic flying, as it seems is heavily emphasized in the russian way of flightinstruction.
By the way Boeing and Airbus training manuals had been adapted to the so called "After T.O. upsets". Both manuals now stress the primary values of IAS and its increase and a positive VSI.
But nevertheless all this said it is much easier to learn to fly a new aircraft having the basic values of attitude and power. Therefore again, thanks for the values. Хорошо

Best regards

Walter
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

PostPosted: Thu May 20, 2010 05:32 Reply with quote
Bell
КВС
Joined: 29 Mar 2005
Posts: 1206
Location: UNNT




We have the very helpful discussions for both of us in this topic . Хорошо

_________________
С уважением, Алексей.
View user's profile Send private message

Now back to the sad practice
PostPosted: Thu May 20, 2010 21:52 Reply with quote
WalterLeo
КВС
Joined: 10 Feb 2009
Posts: 601
Location: Viena Austria




Seems that time the cobra was more or less, but afterwards!!! Удивление

Tu 154 M 2.03 with winglets.
15 deg C 759 QFE
TO: 77,58 to 26,8 MAC
Landing: 76,16 to 26,5 MAC

Regards

Walter
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

PostPosted: Mon May 24, 2010 09:50 Reply with quote
Bell
КВС
Joined: 29 Mar 2005
Posts: 1206
Location: UNNT




Hello,

Sorry for late response since I was a bit busy these days.

Track isn't good, circuit width is 9 km instead of 8. Need improvement.

When flaps are moving from 15* to 0* the airspeed not more than 430 km/h is allowed. On t/o or performing go-around the airspeed shall not exceed 450 km/h when stabilizer is moving to 0* position. You overspeeded these numbers a little. Try to finish flaps retraction and stabilizer movement to 0 in the IAS range of 410 - 430 km/h.

G-force 1.3 and 0,6 while climbing until circuit height, missed this height for about 140 meters.

Exceeded required 450 km/h, overspeeded up to 473 km/h.

Vref was reducing on G/S due to low thrust.

_________________
С уважением, Алексей.
View user's profile Send private message

Next try
PostPosted: Tue May 25, 2010 16:22 Reply with quote
WalterLeo
КВС
Joined: 10 Feb 2009
Posts: 601
Location: Viena Austria




15 deg QFE 759
Tu 154 M V. 2.03 w
77,6 MAC 26,8 Landing: 76 to Mac 26,6

It was the second circuit. Still having problems with level off.

Regards

Walter
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

PostPosted: Wed May 26, 2010 13:50 Reply with quote
Bell
КВС
Joined: 29 Mar 2005
Posts: 1206
Location: UNNT




Circuit width is 6,5-6,9 km. Do you control the lateral distance by NVU?

You did not set trimmers to the neutral position after first landing. Read checklist each time in each stage of flight.

Missed the turn height for about 50 meters.

The reason for levelling off is the late thrust reducing. You should do it at 400-450 meters but done at 590 meters, thus you had an excess power.

When flaps start moving from 0 to 28, you should pull the yoke to compensate liftoff force caused by flaps.

Flare was started at 10 meters. If you had started it at 6 meters the landind could look as an ideal.

That was a good flight but you can fly much better. Still wait for your final attempt for this exercise. Хитрый

_________________
С уважением, Алексей.
View user's profile Send private message

After Sweat and tears the next try
PostPosted: Sun May 30, 2010 16:47 Reply with quote
WalterLeo
КВС
Joined: 10 Feb 2009
Posts: 601
Location: Viena Austria




PT 154M ver. 2.03w

15 deg C, 759 QFE
77,05 to T.O. MAC 26,7 Landing 75,3 MAC 26,3


And a postcard from Acapulco. The lagoon behind the airport was once one of Francis Drakes (the pirat) hiding places and the first Tarzan-film (with Jonny Weissmueller) was filmed there.

Best regards

Walter
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

PostPosted: Tue Jun 01, 2010 10:39 Reply with quote
Bell
КВС
Joined: 29 Mar 2005
Posts: 1206
Location: UNNT




Track width was about 7 km average. need 8.

Gear up at 2,6 meters, too low.

Flaps 0* at 272 meters, turn started at this height as well. Exercise requirement 200 meters for both. you had wrong climb profile.

Missed the final turn a little.

Gear extension speed was 415 km/h that is out of operating limit.

Flaps extended to 28* accurate at 360 km/h which is about exceeding the limitation.

Flare at 15 meters, holding off the runway, pushing the yoke beyond balanced position (it is forbidden as you know) and not soft touchdown after all these mistakes.

Walter, it is time for good flight w/o mistakes. You have standard mistake with profile when climbing but other mistakes are variable.

_________________
С уважением, Алексей.
View user's profile Send private message

Still a lot of problems
PostPosted: Mon Jun 14, 2010 20:25 Reply with quote
WalterLeo
КВС
Joined: 10 Feb 2009
Posts: 601
Location: Viena Austria




To show, that I am working on that, but still many problems and failures.
Tu 154M Ver 2.03 w
15 deg C, 759 QFE
TO 79 to 27,1 MAC Landing 77 to 26,8 MAC
Грусть

Regards

Walter
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

WalterLeo exerc 1
 Project Tupolev Team Forum Index » Project Tupolev Flight School
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum
All times are GMT + 3 Hours  
Page 5 of 8  
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
  
  
 Post new topic  Reply to topic  


AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com Avitop.com
  Powered by phpBB © 2001-2005 phpBB Group. Designed for ProTu-154.com | Webmaster